CATEGORY

4 – Excellent

3 – Competent

2 – Adequate

1 – Inadequate

0–Nada

Score

Preparation

The group was very well prepared; the readings assigned in advance were very pertinent and helped us understand the topic much better.

The group was well prepared; the readings assigned were pertinent and helped us understand the topic better.

The group seemed prepared; the assigned readings were somewhat helpful for understanding the topic better.

The group was not well prepared; the assigned readings were not very helpful and/or pertinent to the topic.

Did they know they were up today?

.

Organization

All of the material was logically organized, with no major problems. All three religions were covered about equally.

Most of the material was logically organized, with only minor problems. All three religions were covered to some extent.

The organization of the material was a bit unclear, with several noticeable problems. One of the religions received less attention.

The material was disorganized, with many significant problems. One or two of the religions were badly neglected.

Which religions are we studying?

.

Content

All information presented was clear, accurate, and thorough; technical religious vocabulary was used well.

Most information presented was clear, accurate, and thorough; proper religious vocabulary was used most of the time.

Most information presented was clear and accurate, if not very detailed. Religious vocabulary was generally good, with few errors.

Information presented was often inaccurate or unclear; religious vocabulary was often missing and/or used incorrectly.

What was it all about anyway?

.

Competence

The group accurately answered all questions posed by classmates.

Group correctly answered most questions posed by classmates.

Group answered some questions posed by classmates, but not well.

Group was unable to answer many questions posed by classmates.

Duhhhh – I dunno!

.

Primary
Scriptures

Pertinent texts from HB, NT, and Qur’an were well integrated as a central part of the presentation.

Several texts from HB, NT, and Qur’an were well integrated in the presentation.

A few texts from HB, NT, and Qur’an were mentioned, but not well integrated in the presentation.

Very few texts from HB, NT, and Qur’an were mentioned, and their significance remains unclear.

Where’s my Bible?

.

Secondary
Literature

Secondary readings were very well integrated in the presentation.

Secondary readings were used in some part of the presentation.

Secondary readings were referred to minimally but not well integrated.

Secondary readings were hardly referred to at all.

What readings?

.

Collaboration
& Teamwork

Each student in the group made an important contribution to the whole; all clearly worked together as a team sharing responsibility.

Each student contributed to the group effort about equally; they all worked together reasonably well, with no noticeable friction.

Most students in the group made good contributions to the joint effort, but it was a bit disjointed as a whole.

Some students in the group did not contribute much and/or each one’s work was disconnected from the others.

Who said we were a team?

.

Oral
Presentation

All students spoke clearly, with effective body language and good eye contact.

All students spoke clearly and had good eye contact.

Most students spoke clearly and had good eye contact.

Some of the students did not speak clearly and/or connect with the listeners.

Mumble,
mumble,
mumble…

.

Audio-Visual

Excellent AV materials significantly enhanced the group’s presentation.

Good AV materials contributed to the group’s presentation.

The presentation had some AV, but the quality was not the best.

The presentation had few pertinent AV materials.

What’s AV?

.

Engagement
& Interaction

The group kept everyone’s attention the whole time, getting us all involved a lot, and leaving us wanting to learn more.

The group kept everyone’s attention for most the time, getting us all involved a bit, and making us glad we came today.

The group kept most people’s attention for much of the time, but we weren’t too involved, and some parts were a bit boring.

The group had trouble keeping people’s attention; others hardly got involved at all, and many students in the class seemed bored.

Did you doze off?

.

PREP:
Readings

Great readings proposed on time, with few revisions needed.

Good readings proposed on time; some revisions done promptly.

Readings proposed slightly late and/or several revisions needed.

Readings proposed or revised late and/or multiple reminders needed!

What?
Me read?

.

PREP:
Worksheets

Great questions submitted on time, with few revisions needed.

Good questions submitted on time; revisions done promptly.

Questions submitted slightly late and/or several revisions needed.

Questions submitted or revised late and/or multiple reminders needed!

Let the Prof. do it!

.

TIMING

x

x

Started & ended on time.

Started & ended +/- a few minutes.

No Clock?

.

Comments:

Total Score: ________________